Your situation
One site, one small team, mostly simple pages
What we would look at
A conventional CMS may fit better and be easier to maintain
Headless CMS Development
We build headless CMS setups: a content system where your team writes and manages content, and a separate website or app that displays it. Webzstore plans the content structure, the editing roles, the preview and publishing steps and the connected frontend (the part your visitors see).
Headless suits some projects and adds work to others, so we assess your needs first.

01Choose
Tick the part you want help with, or plan the whole setup. Your choices shape the conversation on the call and are not a quote.
Where this startsOur editors depend on developers for simple changes, and we want content managed in one place and shown on a new website.
02Decide
Headless means the CMS (the system your editors write in) and the website are built and run apart, joined by an API (a way for one system to request content from another). It is not automatically faster, cheaper or more secure. Test the idea against your own situation.
Your situation
What we would look at
A conventional CMS may fit better and be easier to maintain
Your situation
What we would look at
One shared content store feeding each channel
Your situation
What we would look at
Translated fields and permissions per market
Your situation
What we would look at
Reusable page blocks that editors arrange within set rules
Your situation
What we would look at
A frontend built to combine those sources
03Model
A content model is the plan for which kinds of content exist and how they connect. We draw it with your editors first, then compare options such as headless WordPress, Sanity, Strapi, Payload, Directus, Storyblok and Contentful. Astro and Next.js are frontend frameworks, not CMS products. The model decides which option fits.
04Test
Editors must see a draft before it goes live. Next.js has a Draft Mode that shows unpublished content to an editor while other visitors keep seeing the published page. It needs a CMS that can send editors to a preview address, so we check that first.
Published changes must also reach the live site. Astro builds pages ahead of time by default, so a content change normally triggers a rebuild. Next.js can refresh single pages after a set time or on request. We agree which suits how often your content changes, then test it on one page of every type.
05Handover
We set who can log in and what each role may do, and keep access keys out of public pages.
No. Speed depends on the build, the hosting and the content. We test the pages we build rather than assume the architecture helps.
Yes. WordPress can serve content to an Astro or Next.js frontend through its API. Custom content types and plugin fields only appear there if they are set up to, so we check each one.
Yes, where the CMS supports a preview address. We set it up and test it before handover.
It depends on your content model, editors, languages and hosting. We compare a short list against those needs and explain the trade-offs.

Tell us what your editors struggle with today and where the content must appear. We will say whether headless fits or whether Custom Website Design is simpler.